Slane
Amendment No.: |
Proposed Slane Amendment No. 1 |
Submission/ NOM/ (FTF) NOM Numbers |
(FTF) NOM 4 |
Chapter/Section |
5.0 Village Development Policies and Objectives |
Proposed Material Amendment | |
Amend SLN OBJ 7 in the Slane Written Statement;
SLN OBJ 7: To support and facilitate the delivery of the bypassing of Slane to the east of the Village, which is considered to comprise essential infrastructural development and to construct same subject to obtaining the relevant development consents required to reserve and protect the established route option corridors from development which would interfere with the provision of the project Development of the project will be subject to the outcome of the Appropriate Assessment process. |
Amendment No.: |
Proposed Slane Amendment No. 2 |
Submission/ NOM/ (FTF) NOM Numbers |
MH-C5-943 |
Chapter/Section |
5.0 Village Development Policies and Objectives |
Proposed Material Amendment | |
Remove the following objective:
|
Amendment No.: |
Proposed Slane Amendment No. 3 |
Submission/ NOM/ (FTF) NOM Numbers |
NOM 181 |
Chapter/Section |
5.0 Village Development Policies and Objectives |
Proposed Material Amendment | |
Introduce new objective into the Written Statement for Slane; SLB OBJ XX: To implement and ensure compliance with the Public Realm Plan for Slane which provides for a themed strategy for the provision of street furniture, planting, traffic and parking, lighting, building colours, (local and tourist) signage and surface materials etc. within the town. |
Amendment No.: |
Proposed Slane Amendment No. 4 |
Submission/ NOM/ (FTF) NOM Numbers |
NOM 184 |
Chapter/Section |
Land Use Zoning Map |
Proposed Material Amendment | |
To rezone parcel of land to the east from H1 High Amenity to D1 Tourism Proposed amendment – from H1 to D1 |
|
Appropriate Assessment Consultant Comments This area directly adjoins the SAC/SPA boundary and is right on the banks of the Boyne. This should not be zoned for Tourism and should remain as open space. It is such a narrow strip that a 25m buffer space/open space being applied as open space/buffer space between SAC boundary and land parcel would probably result in much of the land parcel being subsumed by the buffer. This site would be very sensitive to any development given location adjoining the Boyne (including the clearance that appears to have already happened). SEA Consultant Comments Potential negative environmental effects on biodiversity, surface water, and landscape (refer to AA and SRFA assessments). SEA Mitigation Recommendation: Retain Draft Plan zoning. Flooding Consultant Comments Objective required to limit use to water compatible within Flood Zone A/B area. |
Amendment No.: |
Proposed Slane Amendment No. 5 |
Submission/ NOM/ (FTF) NOM Numbers |
MH-C5-361 |
Chapter/Section |
Land Use Zoning Map |
Proposed Material Amendment | |
Amend the land use zoning objective from B1 Commercial / Town or Village Centre to A2 New Residential. Proposed amendment – B1 to A2 |